Cultural adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of ...

Purpose: The aims of the study were to adapt the Fatigue Severity Scale to Chinese conditions and assess the psychometric properties of the ... 跳至主導覽 跳至搜尋 跳過主要內容 CulturaladaptationandvalidationoftheChineseversionoftheFatigueSeverityScaleinpatientswithmajordepressivedisorderandnondepressivepeople MeiYehWang,I-ChaoLiu,ChenHuanChiu,Pei-ShanTsai 精神學科衛生福利部雙和醫院護理學系臺北醫學大學附設醫院臺北醫學大學人工智慧醫療研究中心 研究成果:雜誌貢獻›文章›同行評審 27 引文 斯高帕斯（Scopus） 總覽 指紋 摘要 Purpose:TheaimsofthestudyweretoadapttheFatigueSeverityScaletoChineseconditionsandassessthepsychometricpropertiesoftheChineseversioninpatientswithmajordepressivedisorder(MDD)andnondepressivepeople.Methods:Atotalof101patientswithMDDand94nondepressivepersonswereincludedinthisstudy.AforwardandbackwardtranslationprocedurewasperformedfordevelopingaculturallyacceptableChineseversionoftheFatigueSeverityScale(CFSS).Validitywasassessedaccordingtoconstructvalidity,internalconsistency,concurrentvalidity,divergentvalidity,andcontrasted-groupvalidity.Results:TheCFSSexhibitedaone-factorstructureinpatientswithMDDandthenondepressiveparticipants.A7-itemversionofCFSSandan8-itemversionoftheCFSSdemonstratedbettermodelfitthantheoriginal9-itemversioninthepatientswithMDDandthenondepressiveparticipants,respectively.Inbothparticipantgroups,internalconsistencyvalueswerewithinacceptableranges.Inaddition,concurrentvalidityanddivergentvaliditywereconfirmedinbothgroups.TheaverageCFSSscoreofpatientswithMDDwassignificantlyhigherthanthatofthenondepressiveparticipants.Conclusion:The9-itemCFSSisavalidinstrumentforassessingfatigue-relatedimpairmentinChinese-speakingpatientswithMDD.However,thetworeduced-itemCFSSversionsshowedbetterpsychometricpropertiesthantheoriginalversioninthepatientswithMDDandthenondepressiveparticipants. 原文英語頁（從-到）89-99期刊QualityofLifeResearch卷25發行號1DOIshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-1056-x出版狀態已發佈-1月12016 ASJCScopussubjectareas公共衛生、環境和職業健康 UNSDG 此研究成果有助於以下永續發展目標 存取文件 10.1007/s11136-015-1056-x 其它文件與鏈接 LinktopublicationinScopus fatigue SocialSciences 100% MajorDepressiveDisorder Medicine&LifeSciences 95% Fatigue Medicine&LifeSciences 76% Psychometrics Medicine&LifeSciences 18% psychometrics SocialSciences 15% constructvalidity SocialSciences 8% Group SocialSciences 8% speaking SocialSciences 6% 引用此 APA Standard Harvard Vancouver Author BIBTEX RIS Wang,M.Y.,Liu,I-C.,Chiu,C.H.,&Tsai,P-S.(2016).CulturaladaptationandvalidationoftheChineseversionoftheFatigueSeverityScaleinpatientswithmajordepressivedisorderandnondepressivepeople.QualityofLifeResearch,25(1),89-99.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-1056-x CulturaladaptationandvalidationoftheChineseversionoftheFatigueSeverityScaleinpatientswithmajordepressivedisorderandnondepressivepeople./Wang,MeiYeh;Liu,I-Chao;Chiu,ChenHuan等.於:QualityofLifeResearch,卷25,編號1,01.01.2016,p.89-99.研究成果:雜誌貢獻›文章›同行評審 Wang,MY,Liu,I-C,Chiu,CH&Tsai,P-S2016,'CulturaladaptationandvalidationoftheChineseversionoftheFatigueSeverityScaleinpatientswithmajordepressivedisorderandnondepressivepeople',QualityofLifeResearch,卷25,編號1,頁89-99.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-1056-x WangMY,LiuI-C,ChiuCH,TsaiP-S.CulturaladaptationandvalidationoftheChineseversionoftheFatigueSeverityScaleinpatientswithmajordepressivedisorderandnondepressivepeople.QualityofLifeResearch.20161月1;25(1):89-99.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-1056-x Wang,MeiYeh;Liu,I-Chao;Chiu,ChenHuan等./CulturaladaptationandvalidationoftheChineseversionoftheFatigueSeverityScaleinpatientswithmajordepressivedisorderandnondepressivepeople.於:QualityofLifeResearch.2016;卷25,編號1.頁89-99. @article{580488a8fec64a83b018e65b41a40492,title="CulturaladaptationandvalidationoftheChineseversionoftheFatigueSeverityScaleinpatientswithmajordepressivedisorderandnondepressivepeople",abstract="Purpose:TheaimsofthestudyweretoadapttheFatigueSeverityScaletoChineseconditionsandassessthepsychometricpropertiesoftheChineseversioninpatientswithmajordepressivedisorder(MDD)andnondepressivepeople.Methods:Atotalof101patientswithMDDand94nondepressivepersonswereincludedinthisstudy.AforwardandbackwardtranslationprocedurewasperformedfordevelopingaculturallyacceptableChineseversionoftheFatigueSeverityScale(CFSS).Validitywasassessedaccordingtoconstructvalidity,internalconsistency,concurrentvalidity,divergentvalidity,andcontrasted-groupvalidity.Results:TheCFSSexhibitedaone-factorstructureinpatientswithMDDandthenondepressiveparticipants.A7-itemversionofCFSSandan8-itemversionoftheCFSSdemonstratedbettermodelfitthantheoriginal9-itemversioninthepatientswithMDDandthenondepressiveparticipants,respectively.Inbothparticipantgroups,internalconsistencyvalueswerewithinacceptableranges.Inaddition,concurrentvalidityanddivergentvaliditywereconfirmedinbothgroups.TheaverageCFSSscoreofpatientswithMDDwassignificantlyhigherthanthatofthenondepressiveparticipants.Conclusion:The9-itemCFSSisavalidinstrumentforassessingfatigue-relatedimpairmentinChinese-speakingpatientswithMDD.However,thetworeduced-itemCFSSversionsshowedbetterpsychometricpropertiesthantheoriginalversioninthepatientswithMDDandthenondepressiveparticipants.",keywords="Depression,Fatigue,Psychometricevaluation,Validity",author="Wang,{MeiYeh}andI-ChaoLiuandChiu,{ChenHuan}andPei-ShanTsai",year="2016",month=jan,day="1",doi="10.1007/s11136-015-1056-x",language="English",volume="25",pages="89--99",journal="QualityofLifeResearch",issn="0962-9343",publisher="SpringerNetherlands",number="1",} TY-JOURT1-CulturaladaptationandvalidationoftheChineseversionoftheFatigueSeverityScaleinpatientswithmajordepressivedisorderandnondepressivepeopleAU-Wang,MeiYehAU-Liu,I-ChaoAU-Chiu,ChenHuanAU-Tsai,Pei-ShanPY-2016/1/1Y1-2016/1/1N2-Purpose:TheaimsofthestudyweretoadapttheFatigueSeverityScaletoChineseconditionsandassessthepsychometricpropertiesoftheChineseversioninpatientswithmajordepressivedisorder(MDD)andnondepressivepeople.Methods:Atotalof101patientswithMDDand94nondepressivepersonswereincludedinthisstudy.AforwardandbackwardtranslationprocedurewasperformedfordevelopingaculturallyacceptableChineseversionoftheFatigueSeverityScale(CFSS).Validitywasassessedaccordingtoconstructvalidity,internalconsistency,concurrentvalidity,divergentvalidity,andcontrasted-groupvalidity.Results:TheCFSSexhibitedaone-factorstructureinpatientswithMDDandthenondepressiveparticipants.A7-itemversionofCFSSandan8-itemversionoftheCFSSdemonstratedbettermodelfitthantheoriginal9-itemversioninthepatientswithMDDandthenondepressiveparticipants,respectively.Inbothparticipantgroups,internalconsistencyvalueswerewithinacceptableranges.Inaddition,concurrentvalidityanddivergentvaliditywereconfirmedinbothgroups.TheaverageCFSSscoreofpatientswithMDDwassignificantlyhigherthanthatofthenondepressiveparticipants.Conclusion:The9-itemCFSSisavalidinstrumentforassessingfatigue-relatedimpairmentinChinese-speakingpatientswithMDD.However,thetworeduced-itemCFSSversionsshowedbetterpsychometricpropertiesthantheoriginalversioninthepatientswithMDDandthenondepressiveparticipants.AB-Purpose:TheaimsofthestudyweretoadapttheFatigueSeverityScaletoChineseconditionsandassessthepsychometricpropertiesoftheChineseversioninpatientswithmajordepressivedisorder(MDD)andnondepressivepeople.Methods:Atotalof101patientswithMDDand94nondepressivepersonswereincludedinthisstudy.AforwardandbackwardtranslationprocedurewasperformedfordevelopingaculturallyacceptableChineseversionoftheFatigueSeverityScale(CFSS).Validitywasassessedaccordingtoconstructvalidity,internalconsistency,concurrentvalidity,divergentvalidity,andcontrasted-groupvalidity.Results:TheCFSSexhibitedaone-factorstructureinpatientswithMDDandthenondepressiveparticipants.A7-itemversionofCFSSandan8-itemversionoftheCFSSdemonstratedbettermodelfitthantheoriginal9-itemversioninthepatientswithMDDandthenondepressiveparticipants,respectively.Inbothparticipantgroups,internalconsistencyvalueswerewithinacceptableranges.Inaddition,concurrentvalidityanddivergentvaliditywereconfirmedinbothgroups.TheaverageCFSSscoreofpatientswithMDDwassignificantlyhigherthanthatofthenondepressiveparticipants.Conclusion:The9-itemCFSSisavalidinstrumentforassessingfatigue-relatedimpairmentinChinese-speakingpatientswithMDD.However,thetworeduced-itemCFSSversionsshowedbetterpsychometricpropertiesthantheoriginalversioninthepatientswithMDDandthenondepressiveparticipants.KW-DepressionKW-FatigueKW-PsychometricevaluationKW-ValidityUR-https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84953838381&origin=resultslist&sort=plf-f&src=s&st1=Cultural+adaptation+and+validation+of+the+Chinese+version+of+the+Fatigue+Severity+Scale+in+patients+with+major+depressive+disorder+and+nondepressive+people&st2=&sid=09D6E429C6C944534645982D18319276.wsnAw8kcdt7IPYLO0V48gA%3a7060&sot=b&sdt=b&sl=170&s=TITLE-ABS-KEY%28Cultural+adaptation+and+validation+of+the+Chinese+version+of+the+Fatigue+Severity+Scale+in+patients+with+major+depressive+disorder+and+nondepressive+people%29&relpos=0&citeCnt=1&searchTerm=UR-http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84933566155&partnerID=8YFLogxKU2-10.1007/s11136-015-1056-xDO-10.1007/s11136-015-1056-xM3-ArticleC2-26115873AN-SCOPUS:84953838381VL-25SP-89EP-99JO-QualityofLifeResearchJF-QualityofLifeResearchSN-0962-9343IS-1ER-