Reactance (psychology) - Wikipedia
文章推薦指數: 80 %
Theory Reactance(psychology) FromWikipedia,thefreeencyclopedia Jumptonavigation Jumptosearch Unpleasantemotionexperiencedwhenbehavioralfreedomisthreatened Forotheruses,seeReactance(disambiguation). PartofaseriesonPsychology Outline History Subfields Basictypes Abnormal Behavioral Behavioralgenetics Biological Cognitive/Cognitivism Comparative Cross-cultural Cultural Differential Developmental Evolutionary Experimental Mathematical Neuropsychology Personality Positive Psychodynamic Quantitative Social Appliedpsychology Appliedbehavioranalysis Clinical Community Consumer Counseling Critical Educational Environmental Ergonomics Forensic Health Humanistic Industrialandorganizational Psychometrics Legal Medical Military Music Occupationalhealth Political Religion School Sport Traffic Lists Disciplines Organizations Psychologists Psychotherapies Publications Researchmethods Theories Timeline Topics Psychologyportalvte Reactanceisanunpleasantmotivationalarousal(reaction)tooffers,persons,rules,orregulationsthatthreatenoreliminatespecificbehavioralfreedoms.Reactanceoccurswhenapersonfeelsthatsomeoneorsomethingistakingawaytheirchoicesorlimitingtherangeofalternatives. Reactancecanoccurwhensomeoneisheavilypressuredtoacceptacertainvieworattitude.Reactancecancausethepersontoadoptorstrengthenavieworattitudethatiscontrarytowhatwasintended,andalsoincreasesresistancetopersuasion.Peopleusingreversepsychologyareplayingonreactance,attemptingtoinfluencesomeonetochoosetheoppositeofwhattheyrequest. Someindividualsarenaturallyhighinreactance,apersonalitycharacteristiccalledtraitreactance. Contents 1Definition 2Theory 3Effects 4Empiricalevidence 5Measurement 6Seealso 7References 7.1Bibliography Definition[edit] Psychologicalreactanceis"anunpleasantmotivationalarousalthatemergeswhenpeopleexperienceathreattoorlossoftheirfreebehaviors."[1][2][3]Anindividual'sfreedomtoselectwhenandhowtoconducttheirbehavior,andtheleveltowhichtheyareawareoftherelevantfreedom—andareabletodeterminebehaviorsnecessarytosatisfythatfreedom—affectthegenerationofpsychologicalreactance.Itisassumedthatifaperson'sbehavioralfreedomisthreatenedorreduced,theybecomemotivationallyaroused.Thefearoflossoffurtherfreedomscansparkthisarousalandmotivatethemtore-establishthethreatenedfreedom.Becausethismotivationalstateisaresultoftheperceivedreductionofone'sfreedomofaction,itisconsideredacounterforce,andthusiscalled"psychologicalreactance". Therearefourimportantelementstoreactancetheory:perceivedfreedom,threattofreedom,reactance,andrestorationoffreedom.Freedomisnotanabstractconsideration,butratherafeelingassociatedwithrealbehaviors,includingactions,emotions,andattitudes. Reactancealsoexplainsdenialasitisencounteredinaddictioncounselling.AccordingtoWilliamR.Miller,[4]"Researchdemonstratesthatacounselorcandriveresistance(denial)levelsupanddowndramaticallyaccordingtohisorherpersonalcounselingstyle".Useofa"respectful,reflectiveapproach"describedinmotivationalinterviewingandappliedasmotivationalenhancementtherapy,ratherthanbyargumentation,theaccusationof"beingindenial",anddirectconfrontations,leadtothemotivationtochangeandavoidtheresistanceanddenial,orreactance,elicitedbystrongdirectconfrontation.[5] Theory[edit] Reactancetheoryassumesthereare"freebehaviors"individualsperceiveandcantakepartinatanygivenmoment.Forabehaviortobefree,theindividualmusthavetherelevantphysicalandpsychologicalabilitiestopartakeinit,andmustknowtheycanengageinitatthemoment,orinthenearfuture. "Behavior"includesanyimaginableact.Morespecifically,behaviorsmaybeexplainedas"whatonedoes(ordoesn'tdo)","howonedoessomething",or"whenonedoessomething".Itisnotalwaysclear,toanobserver,ortheindividualsthemselves,iftheyholdaparticularfreedomtoengageinagivenbehavior.Whenapersonhassuchafreebehaviortheyarelikelytoexperiencereactancewheneverthatbehaviorisrestricted,eliminated,orthreatenedwithelimination. Thereareseveralrulesassociatedwithfreebehaviorsandreactance: Whencertainfreebehaviorsarethreatenedorremoved,themoreimportantafreebehavioristoacertainindividualthegreaterthemagnitudeofthereactance.[citationneeded] Thelevelofreactancehasadirectrelationshiptotheimportanceoftheeliminatedorthreatenedbehavioralfreedom,inrelationshiptotheimportanceofotherfreedomsatthetime.Withagivensetoffreebehaviors,thegreatertheproportionthreatenedoreliminated,thegreaterwillbethetotallevelofreactance.Whenanimportantfreebehaviorhasbeenthreatenedwithelimination,thegreaterwillbethethreat,andthegreaterwillbethelevelofreactance. Whenthereisalossofasinglefreebehavior,theremaybebyimplicationarelatedthreatofremovalofotherfreebehaviorsnoworinthefuture.Afreebehaviormaybethreatenedoreliminatedbyvirtueoftheelimination(orthreatofelimination)ofanotherfreebehavior;thereforeafreebehaviormaybethreatenedbytherelationoftheeliminationof(orthreatto)anotherperson'sfreebehavior. Othercoreconceptsofthetheoryarejustificationandlegitimacy.Apossibleeffectofjustificationisalimitationofthethreattoaspecificbehaviororsetofbehaviors.Forexample,ifMrDoestatesthatheisinterferingwithMrs.Smith'sexpectationsbecauseofanemergency,thiskeepsMrsSmithfromimaginingthatMrDoewillinterfereonfutureoccasionsaswell.Likewise,legitimacymaypointtoasetofbehaviorsthreatenedsincetherewillbeageneralassumptionthatanillegitimateinterferencewithaperson'sfreedomislesslikelytooccur.Withlegitimacythereisanadditionalimplicationthataperson'sfreedomisequivocal. Effects[edit] Inthephenomenologyofreactance,thereisnoassumptionthatapersonwillbeawareofreactance.Whenpersonsbecomeawareofreactance,theywillfeelahigherlevelofself-directioninrelationshiptotheirownbehaviour.Inotherwords,theywillfeelthatiftheyareabletodowhattheywant,thentheydonothavetodowhattheydonotwant.Inthiscase,whenthefreedomisinquestion,thatpersonaloneisthedirectoroftheirownbehaviour. Whenconsideringthedirectre-establishmentoffreedom,thegreaterthemagnitudeofreactance,themoretheindividualwilltrytore-establishthefreedomthathasbeenlostorthreatened.Whenafreedomisthreatenedbyasocialpressure,thenreactancewillleadapersontoresistthatpressure.Also,whentherearerestraintsagainstadirectre-establishmentoffreedom,therecanbeattemptsatre-establishmentbyimplicationwheneverpossible. Freedomcanandmaybereestablishedbyasocialimplication.Whenanindividualhaslostfreebehaviorbecauseofasocialthreat,thentheparticipationinafree-likebehaviorbyasimilarpersonwillallowonetore-establishone'sfreedom. Reactanceisamotivationalstatethatisaimedatre-establishmentofathreatenedoreliminatedfreedom.Inshort,thelevelofreactancehasadirectrelationshipwiththeimportanceoftheeliminatedorthreatenedfreedom,andtheproportionoffreebehaviourseliminatedorthreatened. Empiricalevidence[edit] Anumberofstudieshavelookedatpsychologicalreactance,providingempiricalevidenceforthebehaviour;somekeystudiesarediscussedbelow. Brehm's1981study"Psychologicalreactanceandtheattractivenessofunobtainableobjects:sexdifferencesinchildren'sresponsestoaneliminationoffreedom"examinedthedifferencesinsexandageinachild'sviewoftheattractivenessofobtainedandunobtainableobjects.Thestudyreviewedhowwellchildrenrespondinthesesituationsanddeterminedifthechildrenbeingobservedthoughtthe"grasswasgreenerontheotherside".Italsodeterminedhowwellthechildmadepeacewiththeworldiftheydevaluedwhattheycouldnothave.Thisworkconcludedthatwhenachildcannothavewhattheywant,theyexperienceemotionalconsequencesofnotgettingit.[6] InthisstudytheresultswereduplicatedfromapreviousstudybyHammockandJ.Brehm(1966).Themalesubjectswantedwhattheycouldnotobtain,howeverthefemalesubjectsdidnotconformtothetheoryofreactance.Althoughtheirfreedomtochoosewastakenaway,ithadnooveralleffectonthem. Silvia's2005study"Deflectingreactance:Theroleofsimilarityinincreasingcomplianceandreducingresistance"concludedthatonewaytoincreasetheactivityofathreatenedfreedomistocensorit,orprovideathreateningmessagetowardtheactivity.Inturna"boomerangeffect"occurs,inwhichpeoplechooseforbiddenalternatives.Thisstudyalsoshowsthatsocialinfluencehasbetterresultswhenitdoesnotthreatenone'scorefreedoms.Twoconceptsrevealedinthisstudyarethatacommunicatormaybeabletoincreasethepositiveforcetowardscompliancebyincreasingtheircredibility,andthatincreasingthepositivecommunicationforceanddecreasingthenegativecommunicationforcesimultaneouslyshouldincreasecompliance.[7] Millerandcolleaguesconcludedintheir2006study,"Identifyingprincipalriskfactorsfortheinitiationofadolescentsmokingbehaviors:Thesignificanceofpsychologicalreactance",thatpsychologicalreactanceisanimportantindicatorinadolescentsmokinginitiation.Peerintimacy,peerindividuation,andintergenerationalindividuationarestrongpredictorsofpsychologicalreactance.Theoverallresultsofthestudyindicatethatchildrenthinkthattheyarecapableofmakingtheirowndecisions,althoughtheyarenotawareoftheirownlimitations.Thisisanindicatorthatadolescentswillexperiencereactancetoauthoritativecontrol,especiallytheproscriptionsandprescriptionsofadultbehaviorsthattheyviewashedonicallyrelevant.[8] Anumberofstudieshasalsolookedintomediauseandreactance.Forinstance,anexperimentthatexposedparticipantstoimmigrationmessagesthatwasthreatening(forexampleviagroupstereotypesanduncivillanguage)resultedinverylargereactance,intheformofangerandcounterarguing.[9] Measurement[edit] Dillard&Shenhaveprovidedevidencethatpsychologicalreactancecanbemeasured,[10]incontrasttothecontraryopinionofJackBrehm,whodevelopedthetheory.Intheirworktheymeasuredtheimpactofpsychologicalreactancewithtwoparallelstudies:oneadvocatingflossingandtheotherurgingstudentstolimittheiralcoholintake. Theyformedseveralconclusionsaboutreactance.Firstlyreactanceismostlycognitive;thisallowsreactancetobemeasurablebyself-reporttechniques.Also,insupportofpreviousresearch,theyconcludereactanceisinpartrelatedtoanangerresponse.ThisverifiesBrehm'sdescriptionthatduringthereactanceexperienceonetendstohavehostileoraggressivefeelings,oftenaimedmoreatthesourceofathreateningmessagethanatthemessageitself.Finally,withinreactance,bothcognitionandaffectareintertwined;DillardandShensuggesttheyaresointertwinedthattheireffectsonpersuasioncannotbedistinguishedfromeachother. DillardandShen'sresearchindicatesreactancecaneffectivelybestudiedusingestablishedself-reportmethods.Furthermore,itprovidedabetterunderstandingofreactancetheoryanditsrelationshiptopersuasivehealthcommunication. Millerandcolleaguesconductedtheir2007studyPsychologicalreactanceandpromotionalhealthmessages:theeffectsofcontrollinglanguage,lexicalconcreteness,andtherestorationoffreedomattheUniversityofOklahoma,withtheprimarygoalbeingtomeasuretheeffectsofcontrollinglanguageinpromotionalhealthmessages.Theirresearchrevisitedthenotionofrestoringfreedombyexaminingtheuseofashortpostscriptedmessagetaggedontheendofapromotionalhealthappeal.Theresultsofthestudyindicatedthatmoreconcretemessagesgenerategreaterattentionthanlessconcrete(moreabstract)messages.Also,thesourceofconcretemessagescanbeseenasmorecrediblethanthesourceofabstractmessages.Theyconcludedthattheuseofmoreconcrete,low-controllinglanguage,andtherestorationoffreedomthroughtheinclusionofachoice-emphasizingpostscript,mayofferthebestsolutiontoreducingambiguityandreactancecreatedbyovertlypersuasivehealthappeals.[11] Seealso[edit] Bre'erRabbitandtheTarBaby,anUncleRemustrickstertaleknownforitsquotation"Pleasedon'tflingmeinthatbriarpatch" Reversepsychology(anditerationsincluding"double[-]reversepsychology",etc.) Streisandeffect,thephenomenonwherebyanattempttohide,remove,orcensorapieceofinformationhastheunintendedconsequenceofpublicizingtheinformationmorewidely,usuallyfacilitatedbytheInternet. References[edit] ^Steindl,Christina;Jonas,Eva;Sittenthaler,Sandra;Traut-Mattausch,Eva;Greenberg,Jeff(2015)."UnderstandingPsychologicalReactance".ZeitschriftfürPsychologie.223(4):205–214.doi:10.1027/2151-2604/a000222.PMC 4675534.PMID 27453805. ^Brehm,J.W.(1966).Atheoryofpsychologicalreactance.AcademicPress. ^Brehm,S.S.,&Brehm,J.W.(1981).PsychologicalReactance:ATheoryofFreedomandControl.AcademicPress. ^Miller,W.R.(2000)MotivationalEnhancementTherapy:DescriptionofCounselingApproach.inBoren,J.J.Onken,L.S.,&Carroll,K.M.(Eds.)ApproachestoDrugAbuseCounseling,NationalInstituteonDrugAbuse,2000,pp.89–93. ^Miller,W.R.&Rollnick,S.MotivationalInterviewing:PreparingPeopletoChangeAddictiveBehavior.NY:GuilfordPress,1991. ^Brehm,SharonS.(1981)."Psychologicalreactanceandtheattractivenessofunobtainableobjects:Sexdifferencesinchildren'sresponsestoaneliminationoffreedom".SexRoles.7(9):937–949.doi:10.1007/BF00290976.S2CID 144603360. ^Silvia,PaulJ.(2005)."DeflectingReactance:TheRoleofSimilarityinIncreasingComplianceandReducingResistance".BasicandAppliedSocialPsychology.27(3):277–284.doi:10.1207/s15324834basp2703_9.S2CID 14554526. ^Miller,ClaudeH.;Burgoon,Michael;Grandpre,JosephR.;Alvaro,EusebioM.(2006)."IdentifyingPrincipalRiskFactorsfortheInitiationofAdolescentSmokingBehaviors:TheSignificanceofPsychologicalReactance".HealthCommunication.19(3):241–252.doi:10.1207/s15327027hc1903_6.PMID 16719727.S2CID 23194051. ^Dahlgren,PeterM.(2021)."Forcedvs.SelectiveExposure:ThreateningMessagesLeadtoAngerbutNotDislikeofPoliticalOpponents".JournalofMediaPsychology.doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a000302. ^Dillard,JamesPrice;Shen,Lijiang(2005)."OntheNatureofReactanceanditsRoleinPersuasiveHealthCommunication".CommunicationMonographs.72(2):144–168.doi:10.1080/03637750500111815.S2CID 145303261. ^Miller,ClaudeH.;Lane,LindsayT.;Deatrick,LeslieM.;Young,AliceM.;Potts,KimberlyA.(2007)."PsychologicalReactanceandPromotionalHealthMessages:TheEffectsofControllingLanguage,LexicalConcreteness,andtheRestorationofFreedom".HumanCommunicationResearch.33(2):219–240.doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00297.x. Bibliography[edit] Baron,RobertA.;et al.(2006).SocialPsychology.Pearson.ISBN 9780205444120. Mead,NicoleL.(2007)."Reactance".InBaumeister,Roy;Vohs,Kathleen(eds.).EncyclopediaofSocialPsychology.SAGEPublications.doi:10.4135/9781412956253.n433.ISBN 9781412916707. Roeckelein,J.E.,ed.(2006)."Reactancetheory".Elsevier'sDictionaryofPsychologicalTheories.Elsevier.pp. 507–508.ISBN 9780080460642. AuthoritycontrolGeneral IntegratedAuthorityFile(Germany) Other MicrosoftAcademic Retrievedfrom"https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Reactance_(psychology)&oldid=1058910232" Categories:Influence(socialandpolitical)Hiddencategories:ArticleswithshortdescriptionShortdescriptionisdifferentfromWikidataAllarticleswithunsourcedstatementsArticleswithunsourcedstatementsfromApril2019ArticleswithGNDidentifiersArticleswithMAidentifiers Navigationmenu Personaltools NotloggedinTalkContributionsCreateaccountLogin Namespaces ArticleTalk Variants expanded collapsed Views ReadEditViewhistory More expanded collapsed Search Navigation MainpageContentsCurrenteventsRandomarticleAboutWikipediaContactusDonate Contribute HelpLearntoeditCommunityportalRecentchangesUploadfile Tools WhatlinkshereRelatedchangesUploadfileSpecialpagesPermanentlinkPageinformationCitethispageWikidataitem Print/export DownloadasPDFPrintableversion Languages CatalàČeštinaDeutschΕλληνικάEspañolEuskaraFrançais한국어日本語PolskiPortuguêsРусскийTürkçe Editlinks
延伸文章資訊
- 1Reactance Theory in Consumer Research: the Past, Present
Reactance theory is a social psychological theory developed by Jack Brehm (Brehm 1966, 1972; Breh...
- 2(PDF) Reactance Theory - 40 Years Later - ResearchGate
... Reactance theory is built on the assumption that people value freedom (Rosenberg & Siegel, 20...
- 3Reactance (Resistance) Theory - 抗拒說 - 國家教育研究院雙語 ...
抗拒說 · Reactance (Resistance) Theory · 名詞解釋: 抗拒在心理學中用reactance,指一個人感覺到另一個人限制或威脅到自己自由而生的反抗或拒斥的反應。 ·...
- 4Understanding Psychological Reactance - NCBI
Reactance theory, following the tradition of dissonance theory, is a theory of motivation. Using ...
- 5Frontiers | Psychological Reactance and Persuasive Health
Psychological Reactance Theory (PRT)