Validation of the revised piper fatigue scale in Koreans ...
文章推薦指數: 80 %
The revised Piper Fatigue Scale (PFS) is one of the popular instruments to assess perceived fatigue of patients with chronic disease such as ... BrowseSubjectAreas ? ClickthroughthePLOStaxonomytofindarticlesinyourfield. FormoreinformationaboutPLOSSubjectAreas,click here. Article Authors Metrics Comments MediaCoverage ReaderComments Figures Figures Abstract Purpose ThepurposeofthestudywastoevaluatetheconstructvalidityandreliabilityoftheKoreanversionoftherevisedPiperFatigueScale(PFS)inKoreanswithchronichepatitisB. Methods Atotalof146chronichepatitisBpatientscompletedtheKoreanversionoftherevisedPFS.Adescriptiveanalysiswasperformedtodeterminethesubjects’demographiccharacteristics;theconstructvaliditywasexaminedusingexploratoryfactoranalysis;andinternalconsistencyreliabilityofthescalewasestimatedforthemeaningfultotalscaleandfactors. Results Thefactoranalysissupportedtheoriginalfour-factorstructurebasedonKaiserCriterionandMinimumAveragePartial(MAP):Behavioral/Severity,Affectivemeaning,Sensory,&Cognitive/Mood.Inthe22itemsintheoriginalinstrument,patient/impatient,relaxed/tense,andexhilarated/depressedwerere-identifiedfromthecognitive/moodsubscaleandsensorysubscale.TheCronbach’salphaofthe22-itemKoreanversionoftherevisedPFSwas0.96forthetotalscale,andtherangeofCronbach’salphaforsubscaleswas0.90to0.93. Conclusions Theresultsofthestudyrevealedthatthe22-itemKoreanversionoftherevisedPFSisvalidandreliableinKoreanswithchronichepatitisB.FurtherstudiesascertainingthepsychometricpropertiesoftherevisedPFSneedtobeperformedinKoreanpatients. Citation:JangY,KimJH,LeeK(2017)ValidationoftherevisedpiperfatiguescaleinKoreanswithchronichepatitisB.PLoSONE12(5): e0177690. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177690Editor:UrsM.Nater,UniversityofMarburg,GERMANYReceived:December22,2016;Accepted:May2,2017;Published:May23,2017Copyright:©2017Jangetal.ThisisanopenaccessarticledistributedunderthetermsoftheCreativeCommonsAttributionLicense,whichpermitsunrestricteduse,distribution,andreproductioninanymedium,providedtheoriginalauthorandsourcearecredited.DataAvailability:AllrelevantdataarewithinthepaperanditsSupportingInformationfiles.Funding:ThisresearchwassupportedbyaNationalResearchFoundationofKoreagrantfundedbytheKoreangovernment,NRF-2011-0024717(http://www.nrf.re.kr/nrf_tot_cms/index.jsp?pmi-sso-return2=none).Thefunderhadnoroleinstudydesign,datacollectionandanalysis,decisiontopublish,orpreparationofthemanuscript.Competinginterests:Theauthorshavedeclaredthatnocompetinginterestsexist. IntroductionHepatitisBvirus(HBV)isthemostcommonchronicviralinfection[1].TwobillionpeoplehavebeeninfectedbyHBV,andmorethan240millionpeoplearelivingwithchronichepatitisB[2].TheprevalenceofhepatitisBhasdecreased,but4%ofadultsover30yearsoldorolderareinfectedwithHBVinKorea[3].Upto40%ofHBV-infectedpatientsdeveloplivercirrhosis,liverfailure,orhepatocellularcarcinoma[4],anditisknownthatabout15%to25%ofpeoplewithchronicHBVinfectiondiefromlivercirrhosisorhepatocellularcarcinoma[5].PatientswithHBVexperiencevarioustypesofphysical,psychological,andsocialproblems,whichdecreasetheirqualityoflife[6,7].HBVcauseshighsocialandeconomicburdenbecausemostpeoplewithHBVareofworkingage. Fatigueisamajorsymptominpeoplewithhepatitis[7,8].Tounderstandthecharacteristicsoffatiguesuchasseverityitmaybeimportanttoprovidetailoredinterventionsandtoimprovehealthoutcomesinthispopulation.However,littleisknownaboutfatigueamongpatientswithHBV,andthereisnosuitableinstrumenttomeasurethenatureoffatigueinthesepatients. TherevisedPiperFatigueScale(PFS)isoneofthepopularinstrumentstoassessperceivedfatigueofpatientswithchronicdiseasesuchascancer.Thisinstrumentconsistsof22itemsandfoursubscalestoassessmultidimensionalfatigue[9].Thescalewasoriginallydevelopedwith42itemsin1989,andthenitwasrevisedto22itemsbasedonastudyofwomenwithbreastcancerin1998[9,10].ThefinalversionofthePFSconsistsoffourdimensionsofsubjectivefatigue,andthesubscalesarebehavioral/severity(sixitems),affectivemeaning(fiveitems),sensory(fiveitems),andcognitive/mood(sixitems).1)Thebehavioral/severitysubscaleconsistsofitemsrelatedtotheimpactanddistressonactivitiesofdailyliving,2)theaffectivemeaningsubscaleconsistsofitemsrelatedtotheemotionalattributesoffatigue,3)thesensorysubscaleconsistsofitemsrelatedtophysicalsymptomsoffatigue,4)andthecognitive/moodsubscaleconsistsofitemsrelatedtomentalandmoodstatus[9]. Althoughitwasdevelopedforpatientswithcancer,thePFShasbeengloballyusedtomeasurefatigueindiversediseasepopulations[11–13].InKorea,thePFShasbeenusedformeasuringthefatiguelevelofcancerpatientssuchasbreastcancerandgynecologiccancer.ApreviousstudyreportedthatthefatiguelevelofKoreanwomencancerpatientsundergoingchemotherapywasmoderate,withthesensorysubscalebeingthehighest,followedbybehavioral/severityandthenaffectivemeaning[14].InKoreanbreastcancerpatients,thetotalfatiguescorewasmoderate,whilethehighestsubscalewasbehavioral/severity[15],representingadifferentpatternsofsubscalescomparedtothatinthefirststudy.Therefore,thepatternsoffatiguecanvarydependingondiseasetype.However,thePFSscalehasneverbeenusedtoassessormeasurethefatigueandpsychometricfeaturesofpatientswithHBV;however,thisassessmentisrequiredpriortoapplicationofthePFSinresearchandclinicalpractice.Therefore,thepurposeofthestudywastoevaluatetheconstructvalidityandreliabilityoftheKoreanversionoftherevisedPiperFatigueScale(PFS)inKoreanswithchronichepatitisB. Materialsandmethods Researchdesign ThisstudyisamethodologicalresearchdesigntoevaluatethevalidityandreliabilityoftheKoreanversionoftherevisedPFSforpatientswithHBV. Participantsanddatacollection TheparticipantswererecruitedfromMarchtoMayin2011attheoutpatientclinicofauniversitymedicalcenterinSeoul,Korea.Inclusioncriteriawereasfollows:1)patientswhowerediagnosedwithHBVoverthreemonthsafterdetectedHBsAgoversixmonths,2)agegreaterthan20years,3)patientswhohadnolivercirrhosisorhepatocellularcarcinoma,4)patientswhohadotherinfectiousdiseasesorimmunediseases,and5)patientswhowereabletounderstandandsigntheinformedconsentform. Therequiredsamplesizeforevaluatingthevalidityandreliabilityofaninstrumentisfivetimesthenumberofitems[16].Basedonthis,146HBVpatientsparticipatedinthestudyusingtherevised22-itemPFS.Thus,itsatisfiedwiththerequiredsamplesize. ThestudywasapprovedbytheInstitutionalReviewBoardofSHospital(IRBNo.4-2011-0746)inSeoul,Korea.Afterthepatientsvoluntarilyagreedtoparticipateinthestudyandsignedtheinformedconsentforms,theycompletedthequestionnaires. Questionnaires Demographic&clinicalcharacteristics.Sex,age,education,occupationstatus,maritalstatus,andhouseholdincomewerecollectedforthedemographiccharacteristics,anddiseaseduration,antiviraltherapy,AST/ALTratio,andfamilyhistorywerecollectedfortheclinicalcharacteristics. TherevisedPFS.TherevisedPFSconsistsof22numericalitemstoassessfatigueatthetimeofthequestionnaire[9].Theitemsarescoredona0–10Likertscaleandmeasurethefourdimensionsofbehavioral/severity(sixitems),affectivemeaning(fiveitems),sensory(fiveitems),andcognitive/mood(sixitems).Tocalculatethesubscalescore,thescoresoftheitemsonthespecificsubscalesaresummedanddividedbythenumberofitemsinthesubscale.Allitemscoresaresummedanddividedby22tocalculatethetotalfatiguescore,whichhasarangefrom0to10,withahighscoreindicatingahighfatiguelevel. TheinvestigatorgotapprovedfromtheauthorsoforiginalinstrumentandthetranslationprocessoftherevisedPFSproceededbasedonback-and–forthtranslationmethod[17,18]asfollowsteps:1)abilingualnursingresearchertranslatedfromEnglishintoKorean.2)anotherbilingualnursingresearcherindependentlyback-translatedfromtheKoreanversionintoEnglish.3)adoctorandanurseindivisionofGastroenterologyconfirmedtheKoreanversionofrevisedPFS. Thereliabilitycoefficientoftheoriginalscalewas0.97[9],whilethatoftheKoreanversionwas0.93amongpatientswithbreastcancer[19]. Statisticalanalysis TheSPSS/WIN20programandSTATA13wereusedtoanalyzethedata.Adescriptiveanalysiswasperformedtodeterminethedemographiccharacteristicsofparticipants.ThedistributionofscoresofallitemsofthePFSwasexaminedbymean,standarddeviation,andfloorandceilingeffects.Floorandceilingeffectswereexaminedusingthefrequencyofhighestandlowestscores.Floorandceilingeffectscanexplainskewnessofthedata,andthedatadistributioncanbeconsideredskewedif15~20%ormoreofthesubjectsaregroupedateitherextreme[20]. ExploratoryfactoranalysiswasconductedtoexaminetheconstructvalidityofthePFS.Todeterminetheappropriatenessoffactoranalysis,theKaiser-Meyer-OlkintestandBartlett’stestofsphericityweremeasuredforsamplingadequacy.Principalcomponentanalysiswasusedtocreatefactorswithdirectobliminrotation.Iffactorloadingsweregreaterthan0.50,theywereconsideredstatisticallysignificantbasedonthesamplesize[21].TheKaisercriterion(K1),thecut-offcriteriaofeigenvalue>1.0,wasusedtoselectthenumberoffactors,andtheMinimumAveragePartial(MAP)confirmedtheresultofK1. InternalconsistencyreliabilityofthescalewasestimatedusingCronbach’salphaforthetotalscaleandthefactors. Results Participantcharacteristics DemographicandclinicalcharacteristicsoftheparticipantsarepresentedinTable1.Among146participants,two-thirdsweremen,andthemeanagewas48.68±11.81years.Morethanhalfoftheparticipantscamehadlessthanahighschooleducation,55.5%ofparticipantshadjobs,andthemajorityweremarried.Themeanmonthlyincomewasrelativelyhigh.Forclinicalcharacteristics,thediseasedurationwas15.32±9.46years,and71.9%ofparticipantsweretakingantiviraldrugs.Themeanvaluesoftheliverfunctiontestwerewithinthenormalranges,and39%ofparticipantshadmaternalHBVhistory.Accordingtotheeligibilitycriteriaofthestudy,thepatientswhohadlivercirrhosisorhepatocellularcarcinomawerenotincluded. Download: PPTPowerPointslidePNGlargerimageTIFForiginalimageTable1.Demographic&clinicalcharacteristics. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177690.t001 Constructvalidity.Using15%ascut-offforfloorandceilingeffects[20],noitemsdemonstratedanyfloorandceilingeffects.Factoranalysiswasperformedtoevaluatetheconstructvalidity.TheKaiser-Meyer-Olkinscorewas.92,supportingtheadequacyofthedataforexploratoryfactoranalysis.Inaddition,Bartlett’stestofsphericity,atestforoverallsignificanceofcorrelationswithinamatrix,wasstatisticallysignificant(p<.001 basedonthek1rule download: pptpowerpointslidepnglargerimagetifforiginalimagetable2.factorloadingfortotalitems. https: pptpowerpointslidepnglargerimagetifforiginalimagetable3.velicer pptpowerpointslidepnglargerimagetifforiginalimagetable4.resultsofexploratoryfactoranalysis. pptpowerpointslidepnglargerimagetifforiginalimagetable5.comparisonofsubscalevaluesandcronbach reliability.inthisstudy discussionthisstudywasconductedtoevaluatetheconstructvalidityandreliabilityofthekoreanversionofthere visedpfsinkoreanswithhbv.theresultsofthisstudysupportthatthe22-itemkoreanversionoftherevisedpfsisval idandreliableinthissample.however thenumberoffactorsinthissamplewasalmostidenticaltothatintheoriginalversion hence thenumberoffactorswasthesameaswiththeoriginalscale ontheotherhand wemeasuredcronbach therearesomelimitationstothecurrentstudy.first althoughtherevisedpfswasdevelopedforcancerpatients conclusionsthestudydemonstratedthepsychometricpropertiesofthekoreanversionoftherevisedpfsastestedinp atientswithchronichepatitisb.theresultsofthestudyrevealedthatthe22-itemkoreanversionoftherevisedpfsi svalidandreliableinkoreanswithchronichepatitisb.furtherlargervalidationstudiesneedtobeperformedinkor eanpatients. supportinginformations1file.dataset.https: authorcontributions conceptualization:yjkl. datacuration:jkkl. formalanalysis:yjjkkl. fundingacquisition:yj. investigation:jkkl. methodology:jk. projectadministration:yjkl. resources:yj. software:jkkl. supervision:yjkl. validation:jkkl. visualization:jkkl. writing references1. tr viewarticle pubmed googlescholar nelsonnp kimya.trendinseroprevalenceofhepatitisbsurfaceantigen lavanchyd.hepatitisbvirusepidemiology schweitzera kimks yim kimj-s piperbf cranepb romkenste tsaysl parke-h jeongk tabachnickbg brislinrw.back-translationforcross-culturalresearch.journalofcross-culturalpsychology.1970 yud leeeh.constructvalidityoftherevisedpiperfatiguescaleinkoreanwomenwithbreastcancer.jkoreanacadnurs.19 andresenem.criteriaforassessingthetoolsofdisabilityoutcomesresearch.archivesofphysicalmedicineandreh abilitation.2000 hairj zwickwr schmittta.currentmethodologicalconsiderationsinexploratoryandconfirmatoryfactoranalysis.journalofpsy choeducationalassessment.2011 ledesmard ruscioj giacalonea velicerwf.determiningthenumberofcomponentsfromthematrixofpartialcorrelations.psychometrika.1976 velicerwf.therelationbetweenfactorscoreestimates jakobssons gledhillja annunziatama dagneliepc zagheritm parkha.problemsandissuesindevelopingmeasurementscalesinnursing.journalofnursingquery.2005 leeeo downloadpdf citation xml print printarticle reprints share reddit facebook linkedin mendeley twitter email advertisement subjectareas formoreinformationaboutplossubjectareas here. wewantyourfeedback.dothesesubjectareasmakesenseforthisarticle koreanpeople isthesubjectarea yes no thanksforyourfeedback. fatigue sensoryperception breastcancer factoranalysis hepatitisbvirus chronichepatitis materialfatigue>
延伸文章資訊
- 1Validation of the revised piper fatigue scale in Koreans ...
The revised Piper Fatigue Scale (PFS) is one of the popular instruments to assess perceived fatig...
- 2Piper Fatigue Scale - Geriatric Assessment Tool Kit
Qualifying Assessment. ID. PIPER FATIGUE SCALE (PFS). Directions: Many individuals can experience...
- 3Piper Fatigue Scale—Revised - APA PsycNET
Piper, B. F., Dibble, S. L., Dodd, M. J., Weiss, M. C., Slaughter, R. E., & Paul, S. M. (1998). P...
- 4The Piper Fatigue Scale-12 (PFS-12): psychometric findings ...
The Piper Fatigue Scale (PFS) is one of the commonly used multidimensional fatigue measures in th...
- 5Piper (PFS) Scale Fatigue
The PFS in its current form is composed of 22 numerically scaled, "0" to "10" items that measure ...